“We fundamentally disagree with the CFPB’s allegations and believe that this lawsuit is the result of our firm’s refusal to be strong-armed into a consent order,” Weltman Weinberg managing partner Scott Weltman. “We are a law firm that is legally allowed, under federal and state law, to provide collection and legal services. We are being truthful with consumers and factually accurate when we use our name and our company’s letterhead for proper debt collection activity.”

The firm said it has taken every reasonable step to ensure that it collects on consumer debts in compliance with those statutes and to ensure that every statement made to consumers is accurate and not misleading.”

In collection calls and in form letters, the CFPB alleged, Weltman Weinberg repeatedly stressed that it was a law firm. The form letters were on formal law firm letterhead with the phrase “Attorney at Law,” according to the CFPB’s complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. In some letters, the firm referred to possible “legal action” against consumers who did not make payments.

Debt collectors told consumers during phone calls that they were calling from a law firm, sometimes referring to Weltman Weinberg as the “largest collection law firm in the United States,” the CFPB’s complaint said. Those calls were made even though “Weltman attorneys generally had not reviewed a corresponding consumer’s individual account file to reach a professional judgment regarding whether the consumer owed the debt,” the CFPB alleged.

The CFPB’s six-year history has been studded with enforcement actions against law firms. In recent years, the CFPB has accused debt relief firms of illegally charging fees before resolving or reducing consumers’ debts.

In January, the CFPB ordered the two firms and their president to pay nearly $580,000, along with a $78,800 penalty. Announcing the settlement, Cordray said, “Misrepresenting that a lawyer is involved in a debt collection action gives the collection a false weight.”

Copyright National Law Journal. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]