Judge Sandra Segal Ikuta, of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, speaking during a panel discussion at the Federalist Society’s 2018 National Lawyers Convention, held at The Mayflower Hotel in Washington, D.C., on November 16, 2018. Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM
A federal appeals court vacated a court order barring enforcement of a California law that banned mandatory workplace arbitration agreements. A divided panel for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed in part a district court judgment finding Assembly Bill 51—which Gov. Gavin Newsom signed into law in October 2019—was preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act. In January 2020, U.S. District Chief Judge Kimberly Mueller of the Eastern District of California granted a preliminary injunction enjoining enforcement of the law to state and national business organizations, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and National Retail Federation.
The Ninth Circuit majority vacated the preliminary injunction, finding Mueller erred in deciding that the law regulated the enforcement or validity of arbitration agreements in opposition to the federal arbitration statute.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
