Lawyers for Apple on Friday asked a federal judge in San Jose to trim the multidistrict litigation accusing the company of surreptitiously slowing the speeds of certain iPhones because of problematic batteries.

Apple’s lawyer, Christopher Chorba of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, told U.S. District Edward Davila at a hearing on the company’s motion to dismiss that customers had authorized Apple to install software on the affected iPhones and that the decreased performance speed was a trade-off to squelch sudden, unexpected shutdowns. Chorba argued that authorization from the plaintiffs negated their claims brought under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, its California parallel, and for trespass to chattels.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]