With the articles about a law firm owning a pharmacy where their workers’ compensation patients are sent by doctors, where does Pennsylvania stand on a law firm also doing business in nonrelated law areas?

To evaluate the issue, one has to get away from the news articles and stories. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court, a few years ago, added Rule of Professional Conduct 5.7 that talks about when a law firm is involved in a nonlaw-related business. This rule is an important rule, particularly because it discusses when a lawyer in a nonrelated business is going to be bound by the Rules of Professional Conduct and when the lawyer would not be. That’s an important aspect because if the competitors are not bound by the Rules of Professional Conduct, the business may not be as competitive.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]