CRIMINAL LAW
Right to Counsel • Sufficiency of Evidence • Conspiracy • Active Participant • Overt Act
Commonwealth v. Smith, PICS Case No. 13-1047 (Pa. Super. May 1, 2013) Wecht, J. (17 pages).
The evidence proved that appellant was an active participant in the conspiracy and was sufficient to support the reasonable inference that damage to parked vehicles was caused by appellant during the chase, but the trial court prevented appellant from asserting which right he sought to invoke, i.e., whether he sought to assert his right to represent himself or to seek appointment of new counsel. Judgment of sentence vacated.
May 14, 2013 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
CRIMINAL LAW
Right to Counsel • Sufficiency of Evidence • Conspiracy • Active Participant • Overt Act
Commonwealth v. Smith, PICS Case No. 13-1047 (Pa. Super. May 1, 2013) Wecht, J. (17 pages).
Presented by BigVoodoo
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.
We are seeking an associate to join our Employee Benefits practice. Candidates should have three to six years of employee benefits experienc...
Associate attorney position at NJ Immigration Law firm: Leschak & Associates, LLC, based in Freehold, NJ, is looking for a full time ass...
Company Description CourtLaw Injury Lawyers is an established Personal Injury Law Firm with its primary office located in Perth Amboy, New J...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS