Awaiting argument at the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, Kramer v. Nationwide’s outcome will be of great interest to attorneys across Pennsylvania, as the outcome could shed light on the question of whether emotional distress is covered as bodily injury under automobile insurance policies and the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL).

In Kramer, 271 A.3d 431 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2021), the insureds’ son invited another man to the insured’s home while the insureds were away from the residence. While at the residence, the insured’s son provided the other man with drugs that ultimately were deemed to have caused his death. Allegedly, the son was widely known for his sale and use of controlled substances. The deceased’s mother filed a wrongful death and survival action against the son for his alleged negligence in providing the drugs to the deceased. The deceased’s mother also filed suit against the parents for their alleged negligence in allowing their son to use the house in a manner that facilitated the death of her son. The wrongful death action brought by deceased’s mother sought damages for bodily injury, as well as damages that are rooted in emotional distress, mental distress or injury, or any similar injury.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]