Recent efforts to permanently expand the use of remote proceedings in Pennsylvania’s courts fizzled out Monday when a batch of proposed rules addressing how courts should integrate advanced communications technology was discontinued.

Five of the state Supreme Court’s eight procedural rules committees, including civil, had submitted proposals to the high court in January seeking to codify best practices for the use of ACT in their respective divisions. The discontinuation puts an end to all five proposed rule changes.

Stuart H. Sostmann, shareholder with Marshall Dennehey. (Courtesy photo) Stuart H. Sostmann, shareholder with Marshall Dennehey. (Courtesy photo)

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]