Attorney-Client Privilege • Work Product • Appeal
Twp. of Neshannock v. Kirila Contractors, Inc., PICS Case No. 17-1034 (C.P. Lawrence Jun. 20, 2017) Hodge, J. (8 pages).
An appeal concerning discovery issues was proper under the collateral order doctrine. The court concluded the moving party would suffer harm if documents protected by the attorney-client privilege or the work product doctrine were presented to the jury.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
