Zoning • Conditional Use Application • Unconventional Gas Wells • Burden of Proof

EQT Prod. Co. v. Borough of Jefferson Hills, PICS Case No. 17-0867 (Pa. Commw. May 18, 2017) Leadbetter, S.J. (27 pages).

Trial court properly reversed the council’s denial of applicants’ conditional use application because applicants met the specific requirements of the ordinance and objectors’ testimony was the kind of speculative evidence insufficient to constitute proof of detriments to health, safety and welfare exceeding those ordinarily to be expected from the proposed use. Affirmed and remanded.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]