Good morning and happy Wednesday! We’ve got a double dose of Supreme Court oral argument coverage after Tuesday’s lineup of blockbuster hearings. Avalon tuned in for the nearly two-hour debate over a religious person’s right to be accommodated in their work schedule while Brad spoke with federal contract attorneys about the future of False Claims Act litigation in the shadow of United States ex rel. Schutte v. SuperValu. And finally, Emily Saul of the New York Law Journal stepped in to cover an opinion out of the high court from Tuesday which impacts the fraught relationship between New York and New Jersey in waterfront management.
As always, thanks for reading and we welcome feedback and tips. You may contact Avalon Zoppo at [email protected] follow her on Twitter @AvalonZoppo. You can find Brad Kutner at [email protected] and @bradkutner.
The U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, D.C. Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM
Justices Probe Workplace Religious Accommodation Test
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
