For the second time this week, the justices are expected to issue opinions this morning, but they are unlikely to steal the thunder of one of the term’s most high-profile cases: a religion clause challenge involving a 43-foot concrete World War I memorial cross on public land in Maryland. The case has drawn an outpouring of amicus briefs on each side. We focus on one in particular that charts a path away from the high court’s multiple establishment clause tests. We also take a peek behind the end of the popular Supreme Court podcast First Mondays. Thanks for reading, and contact us anytime at [email protected] and [email protected].
Middle Road to a Constitutional ‘Peace Cross’?
When the justices sit down later this morning to weigh the constitutionality of a 43-foot World War I memorial cross on public land, will there be another way—apart from their often criticized and debated establishment clause tests—to find an answer?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
