A New Jersey lawyer who lost a case at trial that another attorney took over and worked to a $1.5 million recovery didn’t make out a claim for tortious interference, a state appeals court says.
The record “clearly lacks the facts and circumstances that would give rise to the ‘rare circumstance,’…that would support a viable claim for tortious interference against another attorney,” the Appellate Division held on April 25.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
