The collection letter at issue is a permissible settlement offer, not a misleading demand for payment.
August 08, 2011 at 05:42 PM
1 minute read
D’Addario v. Enhanced Recovery Company, L.L.C., No. 10-6131; U.S. District Court (DNJ); opinion by Irenas, S.U.S.D.J.; filed July 14, 2011. DDS No. 15-7-3200 [9 pp.]
Plaintiff, Adam D’Addario, alleges that defendant, Enhanced Recovery Company, L.L.C., violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) by making a debt settlement offer that expired before the 30-day window for plaintiff to contest the debt’s validity elapsed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
New Jersey Law Journal honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in New Jersey with their dedication to the profession.
Women, Influence & Power in Law Awards honors women lawyers who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.
WIPL is the original global forum facilitating women-to-women exchange on leadership and legal issues.
New York boutique law firm currently seeking an attorney with substantive knowledge and at least three years experience litigating in New Yo...
LOGS Legal Group LLP is looking to add a Managing Attorney to our Cincinnati, Ohio office. JOB TITLE: Managing Attorney BUSINESS UNIT: Le...
Capehart Scatchard seeks a personal injury defense litigation associate with 1-4 years experience. Hybrid remote work permitted. Must be ad...
