The collection letter at issue is a permissible settlement offer, not a misleading demand for payment.
August 08, 2011 at 05:42 PM
1 minute read
D’Addario v. Enhanced Recovery Company, L.L.C., No. 10-6131; U.S. District Court (DNJ); opinion by Irenas, S.U.S.D.J.; filed July 14, 2011. DDS No. 15-7-3200 [9 pp.]
Plaintiff, Adam D’Addario, alleges that defendant, Enhanced Recovery Company, L.L.C., violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) by making a debt settlement offer that expired before the 30-day window for plaintiff to contest the debt’s validity elapsed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
New Jersey Law Journal honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in New Jersey with their dedication to the profession.
Women, Influence & Power in Law Awards honors women lawyers who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.
WIPL is the original global forum facilitating women-to-women exchange on leadership and legal issues.
Location : This role could be located in any number of cities that we operate in other than Oakwood Georgia. Ideal candidate would reside in...
Wisniewski & Associates, LLC seeks attorney licensed in NJ and NY with 2-5 years experience for its multi-state real estate, land use, ...
New York boutique law firm currently seeking an attorney with substantive knowledge and at least three years experience litigating in New Yo...
