It’s been more than two years since a federal magistrate publicly endorsed the use of predictive coding in electronic discovery, and even though many lawyers still haven’t heard of the technology, most of the heat has gone from the debate. Whether you call it predictive coding, technology-assisted review or computer-assisted review, the term connotes use of computer algorithms to search for dispositive evidence. In this special report, we asked litigation experts to take stock and examine some of the techniques out there.
Tech is Litigation’s Boon, Not Profession’s Doom
Assisted review is merely one way for attorneys to find their way through mountains of evidence.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
