Major rulemakings are expected this year from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Federal Trade Commission, and other “independent” agencies. The more controversial of these rules will be accompanied by dissenting opinions from one or two of the agency’s members. What’s the impact of such dissents?  Potentially game-changing.

In some respects, agency dissents function like a dissenting opinion in a court of appeals.  By pointing out errors in a draft majority opinion, a judge’s dissent can improve the final product. In a similar way, when a dissenting commissioner notes flaws in a draft rule’s terms, or in the explanation given by the commission majority, the opinion can contribute to a final product that is less onerous, more effective, or more thoroughly considered and explained in the “preamble” that accompanies the final rule.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]