Is the Flint water crisis a local calamity or a national controversy with far-reaching implications?
The answer, already subject to two rounds of appellate jockeying before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, could ordain who has the upper hand in dozens of class actions against public officials and engineering firms stemming from the discovery of tainted drinking water in Flint, Michigan.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
