By Jacqueline Thomsen | September 24, 2019
Impeachment talk was accelerated by revelations that are reportedly the subject of a whistleblower complaint made to the intelligence community's inspector general. The whistleblower, whose identity remains unknown, is represented by Compass Rose Legal Group's Andrew Bakaj and fellow whistleblower attorney Mark Zaid.
By Jane Wester | September 20, 2019
In her order, Bronx Supreme Court Administrative Judge Doris Gonzalez wrote that constitutional arguments about the president's vulnerability to prosecution are not relevant in this case.
By Greg Land | September 6, 2019
The U.S. solicitor general said he enjoys getting to pick which cases he will personally argue each term, but there are some he knows he's expected to take.
By Jenna Greene | September 6, 2019
In persuading a federal judge to restore reporter Brian Karem's White House press credentials, the litigator applied lessons from an earlier fight for CNN White House correspondent Jim Acosta. But the White House had also upped its game, according to Boutrous, making Karem's case more complicated.
By Marcia Coyle | August 30, 2019
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit ruled that there was no constitutional violation in the bar association's procedures for collecting members' dues and that attorney Arnold Fleck's First Amendment association claim failed because he forfeited the issue in the district court.
By Jenna Greene | August 29, 2019
In a win for Davis Wright Tremaine litigators, U.S. District Judge Cecilia Altonaga held that the article "is a fair and true report as a matter of law."
By Jenna Greene | August 29, 2019
The president's lawyer Charles Harder has an impressive track record when it comes to winning big-time defamation cases.
By Ross Todd | August 27, 2019
A nonprofit video producer founded by political commentator Dennis Prager argued that a Ninth Circuit panel should revive its claims that YouTube violated its First Amendment rights by restricting access to some of its videos.
By Alaina Lancaster | August 26, 2019
A circuit split and the "exceptionally important" First Amendment issues raised help make this case "an ideal vehicle" for the high court to clarify its position on the disclosure of group affiliations, argue the petitioners, who are represented by Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan.
By Nate Robson | August 23, 2019
Judge Jane Kelly said in her dissent: "Nothing stops a business owner from using today's decision to justify new forms of discrimination tomorrow."
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
Health Law Associate CT Shipman is seeking an associate to join our national longstanding health law practice. Candidates must have t...
Shipman & Goodwin LLP is seeking two associates to expand our national commercial real estate lending practice. Candidates should have ...
Epstein Becker & Green is seeking an associate to joins its Commercial Litigation practice in our Columbus or Cincinnati offices. Ca...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS