By Scott Graham | July 17, 2019
With backing from Defense and Energy departments, Justice tells the Ninth Circuit that failing to stay Koh's antitrust order could jeopardize national, even nuclear security.
By Ross Todd | July 16, 2019
Lawyers with DOJ's Antitrust Division contend that lost tax revenues don't constitute an injury to “business or property” recoverable under federal antitrust law and to find otherwise "could lead to anticompetitive effects from over-deterrence."
By Sue Reisinger | July 12, 2019
It contains two parts, guiding prosecutors in their evaluation of compliance programs at both the charging and sentencing stage of investigations.
By P.J. D'Annunzio | July 9, 2019
California law applies to state law antitrust claims against the remaining defendants in a national litigation over drywall price-fixing, U.S. District Judge Michael Baylson of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania ruled.
By Scott Graham | July 9, 2019
The wireless giant adds Goldstein & Russell to its team while arguing that Koh wrongly found it had an antitrust duty to deal with its rivals. Meanwhile, the FTC has consented to Qualcomm's request to expedite briefing on the merits.
By Alaina Lancaster | June 12, 2019
Gary Reback, representing Netscape at the time, had a front-row seat when the government built its antitrust case against Microsoft two decades ago.
By Ross Todd | June 4, 2019
Lawyers at Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro filed suit in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on behalf of developers who claim Apple's app store is "exclusive and anti-competitive by design" in ways that violate the federal antitrust laws.
By Scott Graham | June 4, 2019
Latham's Matthew Moore argued that IV has aggregated thousands of patents that banks need to do business. But Judge William Bryson wondered how that differs from any industry giant with a massive IP portfolio.
By Scott Graham | May 29, 2019
The San Diego chip giant says that if Judge Lucy Koh's antitrust order isn't stayed pending appeal, it will be forced into lousy licensing deals that can never be undone. But the only authority for that proposition is Qualcomm itself.
By Jenna Greene | May 23, 2019
The lawyers were criticized by name in a decision issued late Tuesday by U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh of the Northern District of California, who singled them out as the “architect, implementers, and enforcers of Qualcomm's licensing practices.”
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS