It’s been three months since the U.S. Supreme Court refused to disturb a $391 million patent infringement verdict that Versata Software Inc. won against SAP AG. Yet on Monday the software giant lodged a new appeal in the case, hoping that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office will offer an escape.
Versata’s lawyers at McKool Smith have coined a term for what SAP is doing—”finality avoidance”—and they aren’t happy about it.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
