The Delaware Supreme Court issued a decision on Friday that should make it harder for plaintiffs lawyers to argue that certain going-private transactions are unfair to shareholders. The ruling is a win for billionaire Ronald Perelman’s company MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings Inc. and defense lawyers at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom and Willkie Farr & Gallagher.

In a 39-page ruling, the court dismissed a suit alleging that MacAndrews & Forbes enriched itself at the expense of shareholders when it took over an affiliate in 2011. More significantly, the court clarified that it won’t second-guess the fairness of deals in which a controlling shareholder buys out minority stock owners, so long as two conditions are met: that an independent committee is appointed to review the deal and that the deal is approved by a majority of minority shareholders.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]