We’ve said it before: Remote hearings, in one form or another, are here to stay.  

Minnesota Senior Judge Kathryn Messerich, who is heading up the state’s effort to develop a uniform process for determining when a court proceeding is heard remotely or in person, made that abundantly clear during an online presentation about remote practice sponsored by the ABOTA Foundation earlier this week. As part of the process behind the oneCourtMN Hearings Initiative that Messerich heads up, the judge and her team have been reaching out to lawyers, litigants, judges and others for their feedback on the benefits and drawbacks of handling certain sorts of matters remotely.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]