Squeezed by tighter budgets and increasing regulations, many legal departments are insourcing their e-discovery processes in order to better control costs and more closely manage their data. But while a significant trend in today’s legal market, insourcing is not as universal as one may think.

Bringing e-discovery in-house can initially be expensive, and legal teams may want to be more operational instead of tied down with e-discovery responsibilities. In the session “Bringing E-discovery In-House: Stories from the Trenches” at Zapproved’s PREX17 conference, corporate legal managers from TransCanada and McKesson discussed the ways they approached and designed in-house e-discovery processes. Their experiences showed the scope of strategies legal departments can use to tame e-discovery and meet the challenges of data management.

TransCanada’s In-House Realignment

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]