The Commission for Lawyer Discipline and one of its compliance monitors claim that a Houston solo who sued to overturn two disciplinary judgments can't do so, because she's exhausted her appeals on the judgments.
"Petitioner does not raise any issue in her petition for bill of review that she did not raise in her appeals. . . . [S]he cannot show that she is likely to prevail in this proceeding," argue the commission and the monitor in Defendant's Original Answer to Plaintiff's Original Petition for Bill of Review and Response to Plaintiff's Request for Temporary Injunction and Request for Permanent Injunction in Kristin Wilkinson v. State Bar of Texas Commission for Lawyer Discipline and Nancy Ashcraft. Ashcraft is a compliance monitor of the State Bar of Texas Office of Chief Disciplinary Council (OCDC), whom Wilkinson sued in her official capacity.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
