Does a lawyer’s website constitute free speech, or is it commercial free speech, which is afforded lesser protection under the First Amendment? It’s an important question a trial court soon will address because of the appellate work done by Lubbock attorney Robert Hogan.

The background to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals’ Oct. 30 decision in Gibson v. Texas Department of Insurance Division of Workers’ Compensation, et al. is as follows.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]