In Minton v. Gunn, et al., the Texas Supreme Court wiped out a defense victory and may have expanded federal jurisdiction over state legal-malpractice claims.
While legal-mal cases traditionally involvestate law claims, lawyers on both sides in Minton wonder whether the high court’s 5-3 decision may have abdicated the state court’s responsibility to hear similar types of legal-malpractice actions in reaching their unusual ruling.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
