In an appeal of a Category 3 slots license before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court that included discussions of what “in” and “townhome” mean, some of the justices took an opportunity to challenge the state Gaming Control Board on transparency issues the jurists admitted were not before them.
Mason-Dixon Resorts, which was denied an application to add slot machines to an existing resort near Gettysburg, was appealing the board’s decision to instead grant an application to Nemacolin Woodlands Resorts in Fayette County near Pittsburgh.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
