With its landmark decisions on health care and immigration, the Roberts Court extricated itself from one of the most politically charged terms in decades.

Some commentators called the health care ruling, in particular, “a defining moment,” a “moment of truth” and a “step back from the brink.” Whatever the label, a conservative chief justice and his more liberal colleagues moved toward each other in surprising ways that kept the Court from becoming a major political issue from now until the November election.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]