A unanimous U.S. Supreme Court has published its decision in Sackett v. EPA, an Idaho couple’s lawsuit challenging an Environmental Protection Agency administrative order issued to the couple after they partly filled a 0.63-acre lot to build their house without first obtaining a federal permit under the Clean Water Act.
The Supreme Court held that the Sacketts were entitled to challenge the EPA’s administrative order as a final agency action subject to judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act because the Clean Water Act did not otherwise preclude such review.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
