A lawyer who persisted with a case even when it became clear it had little or no chance of success deserves no quarter, a state appeals court rules in imposing sanctions.
April 19, 2011 at 06:45 PM
1 minute read
A lawyer who persisted with a case even when it became clear it had little or no chance of success deserves no quarter, a state appeals court ruled Tuesday in imposing sanctions.
The decision, in Xpekt Corp. v. Fame of New York , A-0857-10, showed little sympathy for Fort Lee solo Robert Yu, whose protestations had convinced a trial judge that he had clung to his cause in good faith.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
