A child-custody litigant is asking New Jersey’s Supreme Court to set aside an order that he pay $51,000 to a parenting coordinator — most of it for time she spent responding to his grievances about her performance.
Moses Segal claims in his petition for certification, in Segal v. Lynch , A-2134-09, that such charges were not contemplated by the Supreme Court when it launched the pilot Parenting Coordinator Program in 2007.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
