The case of a man who, having fallen asleep cleaning his gun while under prescribed medication, shot himself in the head may serve as a primer for how precisely the qualifications of experts in medical malpractice cases must match up with those of the doctors being sued.
In Buck v. Henry, A-10-10, argued Wednesday at the state Supreme Court, plaintiff Robert Buck claims his doctor, James Henry, deviated from accepted standards of medical care in prescribing an anti-depressant and a sleep aid.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
