When Berkeley attorney Andrew Dhuey sought to drum up amicus curiae support for overturning a key Federal Circuit ruling on claim construction, his opponent accused him of making a frivolous argument.
Asking the full court to review Lighting Ballast Control v. Philips Electronics, a nonprecedential decision, was likely to get Dhuey sanctioned, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe partner Steven Routh told the American Intellectual Property Law Association in January.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
