Law.com
  • News
    • Newswire
    • Supreme Court
    • International
    • Legal Blog Watch
    • The Hot Seat
    • Video
  • Publications
    • The American Lawyer
    • Corporate Counsel
    • Law Technology News
    • The National Law Journal
    • New York Law Journal
    • New Jersey Law Journal
    • Connecticut Law Tribune
    • The Legal Intelligencer (PA)
    • Daily Business Review (FL)
    • Delaware Law Weekly
    • Daily Report (GA)
    • The Recorder (CA)
    • Texas Lawyer
    • Publication E-Alerts
    • More Publication Sites
  • Legal Research & Directories
    • Books Online
    • Smart Litigator
    • ALM Experts
    • Verdict Search
    • Court Reporters
    • Legal Dictionary
    • LegalTech® Directory
    • Newsletters
    • More Directories
  • Surveys, Lists & Rankings
    • Amlaw 100
    • NLJ 250
    • Global 100
    • The A-List
    • ALM Legal Intelligence
    • Surveys
    • More Lists & Rankings
  • Special Reports
  • lawjobs.com
  • LawCatalog Store
  • CLE & Events
    • CLE Center
    • ALM Events
    • LegalTech
    • Virtual LegalTech
    • Insight Legal Events
    • Webinars
Home
 
Article
Twitter LinkedIn RSS
Sign Up for Newsletters

Law.com Home > History Is on My Side, Says Calif. Justice Who Voted Against Gay-Marriage Ban

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Previous

  • 1
  • 2

History Is on My Side, Says Calif. Justice Who Voted Against Gay-Marriage Ban

July 27, 2009

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

The same thing happened to one of Moreno's former colleagues on the California Supreme Court. Janice Rogers Brown's speeches were used against her when she was nominated to the D.C. Circuit a few years back.

Moreno's speeches aren't ideological.

"I like to talk about foster care, diversity, pro bono, the legal profession, access to justice," he said. "Sort of broad issues."

A Mexican-American, Moreno had warned in his Prop 8 dissent that the majority decision could put all minorities' rights at risk. And he expanded on that thought Wednesday.

"Sometimes a principle, when extended beyond the current facts, can result in unintended consequences," he said.

Moreno pointed out that his dissent cited the dissent in Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214, the 1944 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that OK'd the exclusion of Japanese-Americans from the West Coast. Justice Robert Jackson's dissent decried how a ruling one year earlier imposing a curfew on Japanese-Americans had opened the door to internment camps.

"It's uncertain whether or not the principles the court upheld [in the Prop 8 ruling] will be extended to other groups," Moreno said Wednesday. "But it's a possibility."

Asked if Prop 8 would have been upheld if it banned interracial marriage, he said "clearly not." The court, he said, would have been obliged to follow Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1, the U.S. Supreme Court's 1967 ruling that ended anti-miscegenation laws.

"Even if looking at the California Constitution, race is a protected class," Moreno said. "So under state or federal law, this kind of discrimination would be unlawful."

But didn't the California Supreme Court in In re Marriage Cases, 43 Cal.4th 757, find sexual orientation a suspect class?

"That was my dissent," Moreno said, noting that he "relied heavily on language in the marriage cases affording specific protections against discrimination."

Moreno, who classifies himself as a moderate, is up for retention on the 2010 ballot along with Chief Justice Ronald George and Justice Ming Chin. He said he doesn't expect any major challenges.

"I don't think anybody looks at our court," he said, "as unprincipled or political."

Previous

  • 1
  • 2


Subscribe to The Recorder

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • U.S. Supreme Court
  • 2nd Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Court Officials Seek to Reform Process of Naming Acting Justices
    •      
  2. The 2013 Am Law 100
    •      
  3. Harvard Law Opens Applications to Juniors
    •      
  4. Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit
    •      
  5. Lawyers Sanctioned Over Porn Lawsuits File Appeal
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

EEOC Gets Tough With Companies on Genetic Privacy

Retailers Facing Employment Law Vulnerabilities

Ex-Dewey Partners Face New Foe in Firm's Bankruptcy

S&C Adds Linklaters Restructuring Partner in London
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Cisco E-Book Delivers Ethics on the Go

Collaboration Is Key to Defending Cyberattacks

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Loaner Judges Helping Essex Cope With Persistent Vacancies
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Surrogate Faces Suspension for Political Activity, Drunken Driving
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Circuit Reinstates Lawsuit by Inmate Over Cell Conditions
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Custody Ruling in Bitter Fight May Turn on 11-Year-Old's Wish
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Castille Testifies in Favor of 'Civil Gideon' Funding

Workers' Comp Judges Can't Fight Rescinded Raise
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Others Over Deepwater Oil Spill Disaster
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Filing Blunder To Cost $142,600
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court: Injured College Student Can't Sue State
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media