New Jersey's Supreme Court will review a case that could decide whether a lawyer is liable for furthering a client's illegitimate purpose in pursuing litigation. The resolution will have implications for lawyers involved in what a court may deem a strategic lawsuit against public participation, or SLAPP suit, which can invite counterclaims for malicious use of process. The case also raises the question of what a client must show to rely on the advice-of-counsel defense where a claim is found to be baseless.
N.J. Supreme Court to Take Up Issue of Lawyer's Liability for Client's Baseless Claim
New Jersey Law Journal
January 31, 2008
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to Law.com. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.