The case caption indicates it’s a shareholder suit against AMC, but argument presented at a settlement hearing Thursday showed the conflict remaining in the suit is one of shareholder versus shareholder.

Attorneys for the shareholder plaintiffs and defendant AMC, both in favor of the proposed settlement, argued a stock conversion is the best possible option for shareholders, though objectors held firm that it would unfairly strip value from individual holders of common stock.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]