Filter This View

  • Fasano v. Delaware

    Publication Date: 2024-04-15
    Practice Area: Labor Law
    Industry: State and Local Government
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Fallon
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kate Butler, Kate Butler Law LLC, Wilmington, DE; David M. Koller, Koller Law, LLC, Philadelphia, PA for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Sawyer M. Traver, Devera B. Scott, Zi-Xiang Shen, State of Delaware Department of Justice, Wilmington, DE for defendant.
    Case Number: 22-1329-SRF

    Court dismissed state employee's disability discrimination claim for failure to serve process on the agency and officials he worked for, where service upon the attorney general or state solicitor was in addition to rather than in lieu of service on the named defendants.

  • In re: BYJU's Alpha, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2024-04-15
    Practice Area: Bankruptcy
    Industry: Education | Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. Bankruptcy Court
    Judge: Judge Dorsey
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 24-10140 (JTD)

    Court could issue preliminary injunctive relief to freeze funds at issue in a fraudulent transfer claim where state law authorized prejudgment attachment and equitable claims also provided a basis to issue preliminary equitable relief.

  • Traub v. Stardust389, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2024-04-15
    Practice Area: Labor Law
    Industry: Manufacturing
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Fallon
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Thomas S. Neuberger, Stephen J. Neuberger, The Neuberger Firm, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Timothy P. Rumberger, Law Offices of Timothy P. Rumberger, Alameda, CA for plaintiffs.
    for defendant: Samuel L. Moultrie, Renee Mosley Delcollo, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Justin K. Victor, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Atlanta, GA for defendants.
    Case Number: 22-1582-SRF

    Court dismissed Fair Labor Standards Act claims to the extent they sought overtime "gap time" pay where the statute did not expressly provide relief for such pay.

  • In re Match Group, Inc. Derivative Litig.

    Publication Date: 2024-04-15
    Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
    Industry: E-Commerce | Investments and Investment Advisory | Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: Delaware Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Seitz
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael Hanrahan, J. Clayton Athey, Corinne Elise Amato, Kevin H. Davenport, Stacey A. Greenspan, Jason W. Rigby, Prickett, Jones & Elliott, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Lee D. Rudy, Eric L. Zagar, J. Daniel Albert, Maria T. Starling, Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP, Radnor, PA; Robert D. Klausner, Klausner, Kaufman, Jensen & Levinson, Plantation, FL for appellants.
    for defendant: William M. Lafferty, John P. DiTomo, Elizabeth A. Mullin, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Theodore N. Mirvis, Jonathan M. Moses, Ryan A. McLeod, Alexandra P. Sadinsky, Canem Ozyildirim, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, New York, NY; Blake Rohrbacher, Matthew W. Murphy, Sandy Xu, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Maeve O’Connor, Susan R. Gittes, Amy C. Zimmerman, Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, New York, NY; David E. Ross, Adam D. Gold, Ross Aronstam & Moritz LLP, Wilmington, DE; Joshua G. Hamilton, Meryn C.N. Grant, Latham & Watkins LLP, Los Angeles, CA; Blair Connelly, Latham & Watkins LLP, New York, NY; Michele D. Johnson, Latham & Watkins LLP, Costa Mesa, CA for appellees.
    Case Number: 368, 2022

    Chancery court erroneously applied business judgment rule to review transaction where controlling stockholder stood on both sides and received a non-ratable benefit where not all members of the company's separation committee were independent from the controller.

  • Gordian Med., Inc. v. Vaughn

    Publication Date: 2024-04-15
    Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
    Industry: Health Care
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Noreika
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Andrew L. Cole, Stacy L. Newman, Jack M. Dougherty, Cole Schotz P.C., Wilmington, DE; Ryan J. Morley, John W. Hofstetter, Littler Mendelson, P.C., Cleveland, OH for plaintiffs.
    for defendant: Daniel C. Herr, Law Office of Daniel C. Herr, LLC, Wilmington, DE; David E. Rothstein, Rothstein Law Firm, PA, Greenville, SC for defendant.
    Case Number: 22-319 (MN)

    Although court found most of former employee's restrictive covenants enforceable as reasonably tailored to protect employer's legitimate economic interests, it granted employee judgment where former employer failed to present evidence at trial proving that employee breached any enforceable covenant.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    New Jersey Estate Litigation 2014

    Authors: Michael R. Griffinger, Paul F. Cullum III

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Abdullah v. O'Malley

    Publication Date: 2024-04-15
    Practice Area: Administrative Law
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Williams
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Ahmad J. Abdullah, Wilmington, DE, pro se plaintiff
    for defendant: Shawn Carver, Erica Adams, Social Security Administration, Baltimore, MD. for defendant.
    Case Number: 21-506-GBW

    Administrative law judge erred in concluding that Social Security disability applicant possessed residual functional capacity where the determination was based on a mischaracterization of the record evidence, which indicated applicant had a much more limited capacity than that found by the ALJ.

  • Wright v. Silver Creek Pharm., Inc.

    Publication Date: 2024-04-08
    Practice Area: Corporate Governance
    Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory | Pharmaceuticals
    Court: Court of Chancery
    Judge: Vice Chancellor Will
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kevin M. Gallagher, Andrew L. Milam, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE, attorneys for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Lisa M. Zwally, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Wilmington, DE, attorney for defendant.
    Case Number: 2023-1044-LWW

    Purported written consent in lieu of a meeting could not moot stockholders' request for an annual meeting where the law required the removal of incumbent directors before a non-unanimous written consent could fill the vacancies.

  • Sykes v. Touchstream Tech., Inc.

    Publication Date: 2024-04-08
    Practice Area: Corporate Entities
    Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory | Software
    Court: Court of Chancery
    Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Sean J. Bellew, Bellew LLC, Wilmington, DE; Scott C. McAdam, Law Office of Scott C. McAdam, Henderson, NV for plaintiffs.
    for defendant: Sean A. Meluney, William M. Alleman, Jr., Stephen A. Spence, Meluney Alleman & Spence, LLC, Lewes, DE for defendants.
    Case Number: 2022-0861-SG

    Court declined to dismiss declaratory judgment and breach of contract claims where plaintiff adequately alleged that defendants failed to fulfill their contractual obligations to provide plaintiff with his creditor and equity rights.

  • Harrison Metal Capital III, L.P. v. Math

    Publication Date: 2024-04-08
    Practice Area: Corporate Governance
    Industry: E-Commerce | Investments and Investment Advisory | Software
    Court: Court of Chancery
    Judge: Vice Chancellor Fioravanti
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: A. Thompson Bayliss, Eric A. Veres, Abrams & Bayliss LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Catherine A. Gaul, Samuel M. Gross, Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, DE; Bruce L. Silverstein, Malibu, CA for defendants.
    Case Number: 2022-0261-PAF

    Litigation demand not futile where directors who would give plaintiff a majority lacked any personal or professional connection to the interested controller sufficient to call the directors' independence into question.

  • Travelers Cas. & Surety Co. of Am. v. Blackbaud, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2024-04-08
    Practice Area: Insurance Law
    Industry: E-Commerce | Insurance | Non-Profit
    Court: Delaware Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Miller
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Wade A. Adams, Law Offices of Wade A. Adams, III, Newark, DE; Kenneth T. Levine, de Luca Levine LLC, East Norriton, PA; Lisa C. McLaughlin, Todd L. Goodman, Phillips, McLaughlin & Hall, P.A., Wilmington, DE for plaintiffs.
    for defendant: John P. DiTomo, Emily C. Friedman, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Sarah Fulton Hutchins, Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP, Charlotte, NC; Corri A. Hopkins, Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP, Raleigh, NC for defendant.
    Case Number: N22C-12-130 KMM

    Insurers' subrogation action failed where they failed to identify specific contractual provisions or common law duties of care that were breached by hosting company that suffered a data breach.