Presiding Judge Christopher McFadden (from left) and Judges E. Trenton Brown III and Todd Markle of the Georgia Court of Appeals. (Courtesy photos)
Should tractor classification in farmers’ insurance policies be taken from the language of the policy itself or existing case law? That is the question Freeman Mathis & Gary attorney Philip Savrin brought to the Georgia Court of Appeals in oral arguments on Thursday on behalf of Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance.
The plaintiff-appellee, a farming company, originally sued Nationwide, seeking a declaration that their insurance policy provided uninsured motorist (UM) coverage for an accident involving one of their tractors, which they contend was insured for liability under the policy and because they never rejected such coverage in writing.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
