At a Sept. 6 status hearing, lawyers on both sides of the talcum powder lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson debated the impact of the upcoming amendments to Federal Rule 702 of Evidence.
October 19, 2023 at 11:27 AM
6 minute read
At his first hearing in the litigation over Johnson & Johnson’s baby powder, U.S. District Judge Michael Shipp had a laundry list of items to discuss, but at the top was the upcoming change to the federal rule of evidence.
“Do you believe that this new contemplated rule, or Evidence Rule 702, does it have any impact on Judge Wolfson’s opinion?” he asked lawyers at the Sept. 6 hearing, in Trenton, New Jersey, according to a transcript. “Do you think it makes it vulnerable?”
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
