By Michael Kemps & Michael Paul, Innovative Computing Systems, Inc. | December 13, 2023
By being proactive and staying agile, law firms can position themselves for success in this rapidly changing tech-driven world.
By Drew Blazaitis, Fulcrum GT | December 12, 2023
While AI can potentially drive innovation and improve efficiency, unfocused investments in AI can expose inaccurate and misleading information and insights that fail to add real value.
Daily Business Review | Commentary
By Evan Nierman | December 6, 2023
A new cottage industry within the legal profession must emerge as a direct consequence of deepfakes and the crises that subsequently ensue.
By Jeff Cox, UniCourt | November 28, 2023
KM touches everything in law firms connected to technology, data, and service delivery, and it carries the innate potential to enhance all other functions within a firm when adequately utilized.
By Tom O'Brien, Research Contract Consultants | November 16, 2023
Many times, negotiating with your research provider can feel like a one-way conversation, but firms do have more ability to affect their rates than may meet the eye.
By Gary Sangha, LexCheck | November 14, 2023
Strategically implementing generative AI can empower legal professionals to improve workflows and performance.
By Evan Foster, Leah Leyendecker & Grace Cheng, Saul Ewing | November 13, 2023
In an age where technology permeates nearly every facet of business, the importance of having a general understanding of Information Technology (IT) contracts is crucial.
By Evan Wong, Checkbox | November 7, 2023
Previously seen as gatekeepers of compliance and risk management, corporate legal departments now play a crucial role in strategic decision-making and business innovation, including the integration of AI into legal operations.
By Chet Kronenberg, Laura Lin and Rachel June-Graber | October 31, 2023
In the employment discrimination context, the use of AI offers the possibility of eliminating bias from employment decisions, but the current reality may be just the opposite, according to Simpson Thacher & Bartlett's Chet Kronenberg, Laura Lin and Rachel June-Graber.
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Patricia E. Antezana | October 31, 2023
One mechanism that courts can use to limit discovery is Federal Rule 26(b)(2)(C). Rule 26(b)(2)(C) instructs that a court must limit the frequency or extent of discovery if it determines that: "the discovery sought is unreasonably cumulative or duplicative, or can be obtained from some other source that is more convenient, less burdensome, or less expensive; the party seeking discovery has had ample opportunity to obtain the information by discovery in the action; or the proposed discovery is outside the scope permitted by Rule 26(b)(1)."
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.
Consulting Magazine identifies consultants that have the biggest impact on their clients, firms and the profession.
The National Law Journal Elite Trial Lawyers recognizes U.S.-based law firms performing exemplary work on behalf of plaintiffs.
Associate attorney position at NJ Immigration Law firm: Leschak & Associates, LLC, based in Freehold, NJ, is looking for a full time ass...
Company Description CourtLaw Injury Lawyers is an established Personal Injury Law Firm with its primary office located in Perth Amboy, New J...
McCarter & English, LLP, a well established and growing law firm, is actively seeking a talented and driven associate having 2-5 years o...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS