National Law Journal | Commentary
By Melvin I. Urofsky | October 28, 2022
It is very possible that Justice Alito will give us another angry opinion—this time on affirmative action. Admissions offices are already preparing for a negative decision.
National Law Journal | Commentary
By Tony Mauro | October 14, 2022
As the Supreme Court's new term begins, some important new books about the court have arrived.
National Law Journal | Commentary
By David Marroso, Tim Heafner and Talia Alsalam | October 13, 2022
Leveraging the explosion of and comfort with videoconference witness's testimony, enterprising parties are increasingly trying a workaround from the traditional rules.
National Law Journal | Commentary
By William W. Taylor III | October 10, 2022
The simple reality is that, years ago, The Federalist Society and its de facto leader, Leonard Leo, set out to create a court which would overrule Roe. And they succeeded.
National Law Journal | Commentary
By Lori L. Pines | October 10, 2022
Lawyers not only have a duty to clients to attend to well-being, they owe that duty to themselves because no one else has a greater ability to influence his or her own well-being.
National Law Journal | Commentary
By Andrea M. Kirshenbaum and Leanne Lane Coyle | October 6, 2022
Although recent district court opinions may signal a turning of the tide on the court-approval requirement for FLSA actions, the law in this area clearly is in a state of flux.
National Law Journal | Commentary
By Michael H. Levin | October 5, 2022
After three months, the murky implications of "West Virginia" begin to unfold.
National Law Journal | Commentary
By David C. Vladeck | October 3, 2022
The financial industry has benefited from the use of forced arbitration and will argue that Congress' action under the CRA would bar further action by the CFPB. However, that argument is baseless.
National Law Journal | Commentary
By Tony Mauro | September 30, 2022
Chief Justice Warren Burger died in 1995, but efforts to write the biography of his life and legacy have taken time.
National Law Journal | Commentary
By Peter R. Zeidenberg and Michael F. Dearington | September 29, 2022
The courts have, for now, stepped in and put a halt to the most egregious of prosecutions under the China Initiative. By the time the courts acted, great damage has already been done—careers are lost, finances drained, and lives forever scarred.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The National Law Journal Elite Trial Lawyers recognizes U.S.-based law firms performing exemplary work on behalf of plaintiffs.
The National Law Journal honors attorneys & judges who've made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in the D.C. area.
The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.
Associate attorney position at NJ Immigration Law firm: Leschak & Associates, LLC, based in Freehold, NJ, is looking for a full time ass...
Company Description CourtLaw Injury Lawyers is an established Personal Injury Law Firm with its primary office located in Perth Amboy, New J...
McCarter & English, LLP, a well established and growing law firm, is actively seeking a talented and driven associate having 2-5 years o...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS