When Congress passed the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), it was hailed by the White House as “a once-in-a-generation investment in our nation’s infrastructure and competitiveness.” Politicians lauded IIJA as the historic opportunity to repair the “one-in-five miles of our roadways and more than 45,000 bridges in the United States rated as ‘in poor condition.’” And like its predecessor federal funding packages (the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act), the IIJA attaches strings to the use of the funds, including those reflected in the Build America, Buy America Act (BABA). 

BABA is the latest federal regulatory restriction on the use of “foreign” materials in public works projects. It is specifically intended to ensure that “none of the funds made available for a federal financial assistance program for infrastructure, including each deficient program, may be obligated for a project unless all of the iron, steel, manufactured products, and construction materials used in the project are produced in the United States.” In United Blower v. Lycoming County Water & Sewer Authority, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court recently observed:

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]