The appellants appeal the denial of their motion to dissolve a permanent injunction that ordered them to comply with their home's deed restrictions. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by concluding that the harm of finding an alternative insurer and the expense of installing a compliant roof were not so disproportionate to the benefit of enforcing the covenant as to require dissolving the injunction. The trial court's judgment is affirmed. Houston's 14th Court of Appeals, No. 14-12-00250-CV, 01-15-2013.
Schuring v. Fosters Mill Village Community Association
Tex. App. Dist. 14
January 18, 2013
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to Texas Lawyer. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.