Law.com
  • News
    • Newswire
    • Supreme Court
    • International
    • Legal Blog Watch
    • The Hot Seat
    • Video
  • Publications
    • The American Lawyer
    • Corporate Counsel
    • Law Technology News
    • The National Law Journal
    • New York Law Journal
    • New Jersey Law Journal
    • Connecticut Law Tribune
    • The Legal Intelligencer (PA)
    • Daily Business Review (FL)
    • Delaware Law Weekly
    • Daily Report (GA)
    • The Recorder (CA)
    • Texas Lawyer
    • Publication E-Alerts
    • More Publication Sites
  • Legal Research & Directories
    • Books Online
    • Smart Litigator
    • ALM Experts
    • Verdict Search
    • Court Reporters
    • Legal Dictionary
    • LegalTech® Directory
    • Newsletters
    • More Directories
  • Surveys, Lists & Rankings
    • Amlaw 100
    • NLJ 250
    • Global 100
    • The A-List
    • ALM Legal Intelligence
    • Surveys
    • More Lists & Rankings
  • Special Reports
  • lawjobs.com
  • LawCatalog Store
  • CLE & Events
    • CLE Center
    • ALM Events
    • LegalTech
    • Virtual LegalTech
    • Insight Legal Events
    • Webinars
Home
 
Article
Twitter LinkedIn RSS
Sign Up for Newsletters

Law.com Home > Sotomayor Running Out of Potential GOP Support

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Sotomayor Running Out of Potential GOP Support

By David Ingram All Articles 

The National Law Journal

July 28, 2009

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •       Comments (1)
 

Related Items

  • During Senate Questioning, Sotomayor Explains Controversial Statements, Defends Rulings
  • Sotomayor Hearing Revives Old Battle About Questioning of High Court Nominees

The chances are dwindling that a substantial number of Republicans will vote to confirm Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor, after a key GOP senator announced his opposition Monday morning.

Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., ended months of public indecision when he announced he would vote against confirmation, eliminating one of the last, best chances Sotomayor had of winning over prominent conservatives. Sessions, the top Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, had previously said he had concerns about her nomination but had stopped short of saying he would oppose her.

The announcement means the vote on whether to confirm Sotomayor will likely stick close to the partisan divide, continuing the trend of polarization on judicial nominations.

The Judiciary Committee is scheduled to consider Sotomayor's nomination today, and only one Republican member -- Sen. Lindsey Graham, S.C. -- out of the seven on the committee has said he plans to support her. The full Senate is expected to vote on the nomination next week after as many as four days of debate, and five Republicans have pledged their support. That's only one more vote from the minority party than Justice Samuel Alito Jr. received in 2006, when four Democrats voted to confirm him.

Some conservative groups have ratcheted up the pressure on GOP senators, and on conservative Democrats, to oppose Sotomayor. The National Rifle Association has announced its opposition and said it would include the confirmation vote in its scoring of members' records.

Three of the Republicans supporting Sotomayor -- Sens. Susan Collins, Richard Lugar and Olympia Snowe are among the least conservative Republicans in the Senate. A fourth, Sen. Mel Martinez, cited a shared Hispanic heritage as one reason for supporting her.

Sessions' announcement followed a statement last week from another key Judiciary Committee member, Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, who supported both Clinton nominees to the Supreme Court. Hatch, a former Judiciary Committee chairman, said he would reluctantly oppose Sotomayor's nomination. Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, another senior committee member, said late Monday afternoon he also plans to vote no.

Among those noting the minimal Republican support are the gamblers on Intrade, a Web site that allows people to bet on the outcome of public affairs. As of Monday afternoon, the betting market said there was only a 10 percent chance that Sotomayor would receive 75 or more votes, down from a high of almost 80 percent just after her confirmation hearing.

This article first appeared on The BLT: The Blog of Legal Times.



Subscribe to The National Law Journal

You must be signed in to comment on an article

 

Reader Comments

  • SuaSponte

    July 28, 2009 08:44 AM

    This was utterly predictable from the start. The minority Plutocratic Party will not endorse anyone who is unprepared to serve its corporate and most wealthy of us all constituency.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Post a Comment »
Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Republicans
  • Senate Judiciary Committee
  • Supreme Court
  • GOP
  • Democrats
  • National Rifle Association
  • Legal Times

Key categories

    
  • US Supreme Court

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Court Officials Seek to Reform Process of Naming Acting Justices
    •      
  2. The 2013 Am Law 100
    •      
  3. Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit
    •      
  4. Lawyers Sanctioned Over Porn Lawsuits File Appeal
    •      
  5. Law for Laymen
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Hiring Interns? Be Sure to Do It Right

ACC Weighs in on Arizona's In-House Pro Bono Rules

Ex-Dewey Partners Face New Foe in Firm's Bankruptcy

S&C Adds Linklaters Restructuring Partner in London
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Enron Sandbox Stirs Up Private Data, Again

LegalTech West Coast Wraps Up With Ethics, VC News

In Tricky Prosecutions, Judges Play Peacemakers

Ropers Majeski Tries to Re-Invent Itself
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Summer Programs Still in a Drought

Lawyer Not Covered for Alleged Malpractice at Prior Firm
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Firm Takes Another Hit in Bid for 'Unconscionable' Fees

New York's Martin Act Faces Test in Challenge to 2005 Case

Castille Testifies in Favor of 'Civil Gideon' Funding

Workers' Comp Judges Can't Fight Rescinded Raise
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Others Over Deepwater Oil Spill Disaster
  •      
    • Subscription Required

'Follow That Escapee!'

Judge Who Tossed Defense Counsel Accused of 'Partiality'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media