• Infomedia Group, Inc. v. Orange Health Solutions, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2020-08-19
    Practice Area: Contracts
    Industry: Call Centers | Health Care | Software
    Court: Delaware Superior Court
    Judge: Judge LeGrow
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Daniel J. Brown and Hayley J. Reese, McCarter & English, LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Daniel B. Rath, Rebecca L. Butcher, and Nicolas E. Jenner, Landis Rath& Cobb, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Alan S. Wachs, Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP, Jacksonville, FL; Donald H. Chase, Morrison Cohen LLP, New York, NY for defendants.

    Case Number: D69087

    Fraudulent misrepresentation claims failed due to anti-reliance provision in asset purchase agreement where sophisticated parties expressly limited representations and reliance to written notice of customer terminations.

  • AssuredPartners of Virginia, LLC v. Sheehan

    Publication Date: 2020-06-17
    Practice Area: Contracts
    Industry: Insurance
    Court: Delaware Superior Court
    Judge: Judge LeGrow
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Gregory P. Williams, Blake Rohrbacher, Matthew D. Perri, and Kevin M. Regan, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Joseph G. Santoro and Roger W. Feicht, Gunster, West Palm Beach, FL, for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Martin S. Lessner, Lauren Dunkle Fortunato, and Kevin P. Rickert, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE, for defendants.

    Case Number: D69014

    Breach of asset purchase agreement claims allowed to proceed where plaintiff alleged defendant sellers breached agreement by making unauthorized post-closing payments to certain defendants and by failing to disclose pre-closing liabilities.

  • Guy v. City of Wilmington

    Publication Date: 2020-06-03
    Practice Area: Government
    Industry: State and Local Government
    Court: Delaware Superior Court
    Judge: Judge LeGrow
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Samuel L. Guy, The Law Office of Samuel L. Guy, Wilmington, DE for petitioner.
    for defendant: Daniel A. Griffith and Kaan Ekiner, Whiteford Taylor Preston LLC , Wilmington, DE for respondent.

    Case Number: D69003

    Although a dispute about the validity of city council votes constituted a justiciable controversy, a rule re-quiring a supermajority vote for certain amendments did not violate the city charter.

  • The Am. Bottling Co. v. Repole

    Publication Date: 2020-05-27
    Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
    Industry: Food and Beverage
    Court: Delaware Superior Court
    Judge: Judge LeGrow
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Garrett B. Moritz and Anne M. Steadman, Ross Aronstam& Moritz LLP, Wilmington, DE; Robert C. Walters, Russell H. Falconer, and Megan Z. Hulce, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Dallas, TX for plaintiff.
    for defendant: A. Thompson Bayliss and Daniel J. McBride, Abrams & Bayliss LLP, Wilmington, DE; David H. Bernstein, Jyotin Hamid, Jared I. Kaga, and Matthew J. Patrozziello, Debevois& Plimpton LLP, New York, NY for defendants.

    Case Number: D68991

    Attorney-client privilege waived for communications disclosed to counterparty in merger transaction where the merger parties' shared interests were commercial rather than legal in nature.

  • Nokia Solutions & Networks Oy v. Collision Commc'ns, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2020-05-13
    Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
    Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: Delaware Superior Court
    Judge: Judge LeGrow
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: James J. Freebery, Daniel J. Brown, Hayley J. Reese, McCarter & English, LLP, Wilmington, DE; David Himelfardm McCarter & English, LLP, Boston, MA for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Douglas D. Herrmann and James H.S. Levine, Pepper Hamilton LLP, Wilmington, DE; Tyler E. Chapman of Todd & Weld, LLP, Boston, MA for defendant.

    Case Number: D68980

    The court granted defendant's motion for a stay, because this case was contemporaneously filed with another proceeding, and the parties were more naturally aligned in the other proceeding.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court Rules 2024

    Authors:

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Quarum v. Mitchell Int'l, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2020-02-05
    Practice Area: Deals and Transactions
    Industry: Insurance | Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: Delaware Superior Court
    Judge: Judge LeGrow
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: David P. Primack and David W. Giattino, McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Noah Jarrett of Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC, Portland, OR for plaintiff.
    for defendant: John P. DiTomo, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael A. Duffy and Michael C. McCutcheon, Baker & McKenzie LLP, Chicago, IL for defendant.

    Case Number: D68869

    A complaint contained sufficient allegations to support some of the breach of contract claims, and the election of remedies doctrine did not preclude relief.

  • Ocimum Biosolutions (India) Ltd. v. AstraZeneca UK Ltd.

    Publication Date: 2019-12-25
    Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
    Industry: Pharmaceuticals | Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: Delaware Superior Court
    Judge: Judge LeGrow
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kevin S. Mann, Michael L. Vild and Christopher P. Simon, Cross & Simon, LLC, Wilmington, DE; C. Ed-ward Polk, Jr., Polk Law PLLC, Ashburn, VA for plaintiffs.
    for defendant: Michael P. Kelly, Daniel M. Silver, Benjamin A. Smyth and Steven P. Wood, McCarter & English, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Dane H. Butswinkas of Williams & Connolly, LLP, Washington, D.C. for defendant.

    Case Number: D68819

    Certain red flags signaled the existence of information that would have led a prudent person to discover po-tential causes of action for breach of contract or trade secret violations.

  • Solera Holdings, Inc. v. XL Specialty Ins. Co.

    Publication Date: 2019-08-14
    Practice Area: Insurance Law
    Industry: Automotive | Insurance | Software
    Court: Delaware Superior Court
    Judge: Judge LeGrow
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: David J. Baldwin and Carla M. Jones, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Peter M. Gillon, Alexander D. Har-diman and Tamara D. Bruno, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, Washington, DC for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Gregory F. Fischer and Angelo G. Savino, Cozen O’Connor, Wilmington, DE and Washington, DC for defendants ACE Ameri-can Ins. Co. and Fed. Ins. Co. Carmella P. Keener, Rosenthal, Monhait & Goddess, P.A., Wilmington, DE for defendants En-durance Am. Ins. Co. and Liberty Ins. Underwriters Inc. Ronald P. Schiller, Michael R. Carlson and Matthew N. Klebanoff, Hangley Aronchick Segal Pudlin & Schiller, Philadelphia, PA for Endurance Am. Ins. Co. Scott A. Schechter and Matthew E. Mawby, Kaufman Borgeest & Ryan LLP, Valhalla, NY for defendant Liberty Ins. Underwriters Inc. Bruce W. McCullough, Bodell Bové, LLC, Wilmington, DE for defendant Zurich Am. Ins. Co. Bruce E. Jameson and John G. Day, Prickett, Jones & Elliott, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Tammy Yuen and Kenneth M. McBrady, III, Skarzynski Black LLC , New York, NY for defendant XL Specialty Ins. Co. Kurt M. Heyman and Aaron M. Nelson, Heyman Enerio Gattuso & Hirzel LLP, Wilmington, DE; Scott B. Schreiber and James W. Thomas, Jr., Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Washington, DC for defendant Illinois Nat’l Ins. Co. Stephen F. Dryden, Weber Gallagher Simpson Stapleton Fires & Newby, LLP, New Castle, DE for defendant Hudson Ins. Co. John C. Phillips, Jr. and David A. Bilson, Phillips, Goldman, McLaughlin & Hall, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Geoffrey W. Heineman and Jung H. Park, Ropers, Majeski Kohn & Bentley, New York, NY for defendant Argonaut Ins. Co.

    Case Number: D68667

    The court held that the claimed loss fell within the plain language of the insurance policies, and other factual issues precluded summary judgment.

  • V&M Aerospace LLC v. V&M Co.

    Publication Date: 2019-07-31
    Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
    Industry: Chemicals and Materials
    Court: Delaware Superior Court
    Judge: Judge LeGrow
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Catherine A. Gaul and Hayley M. Lenahan, Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, DE; Peter L. Loh and Davis G. Mosmeyer, III, Fo-ley & Lardner LLP, Dallas, TX for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Robert A. Penza and Christina M. Belitz, Polsinelli PC, Wilmington, DE; Michael Stiles, StilesPomeroy LLP, Pasadena, CA for defendant.

    Case Number: D68653

    The plain language of the parties' asset purchase agreement permitted one party to offset its payments to the other, but the reasonableness of attorney fees could not be determined on summary judgment.

  • 3M Co. v. Neology, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2019-07-10
    Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
    Industry: Electronics | Investments and Investment Advisory
    Court: Delaware Superior Court
    Judge: Judge LeGrow
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Rafel Z. Zahralddin-Aravena, and Jonathan M. Stemerman, Elliott Greenleaf, P.C., Wilmington, DE; Lawrence M. Shapiro and Sybil L. Dunlop, Greene Espel PLLP, Minneapolis, MN for plaintiff
    for defendant: Catherine A. Gaul, Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, DE; John D. Alessio and Alex G. Brizolis, Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP, San Diego, CA; T. Brad Davy and Jonathan A. Choa, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendants.

    Case Number: D68622

    Implied covenant and breach of contract claims failed where claimant failed to allege a contractual gap to be filled by the implied covenant and where the contract made indemnification the parties' sole remedy.