Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
129 results for '* judge:"District Judge Noreika"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2019-02-27
Practice Area: Antitrust
Industry: Health Care
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Richard H. Cross, Jr., Cross & Simon, LLC, Wilmington, DE; Daniel W. Tarpey and Matthew M. Showel, Tarpey Wix LLC, Chicago, IL for plaintiff. Raymond J. DiCamillo, Chad Shandler and Katharine L. Mowery, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Steven F. Barley, Marc A. Marinaccio and J. Robert Robertson, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Washington, DC for Laboratory Corp. of America defend-ants.
for defendant: Jody C. Barillare, Eric Kraeutler, Steven A. Reed, R. Brendan Fee, Zachary M. Johns and Alexandra M. Lastowski, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Wilmington, DE and Philadelphia, PA for AmeriHealth de-fendants.
Case Number: D68476
Plaintiff lacked standing to assert an antitrust claim and it failed to adequately allege a relevant market.
Publication Date: 2019-02-27
Practice Area: Contracts | Dispute Resolution
Industry: Consumer Products | Distribution and Wholesale
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys: For plaintiff: James D. Taylor, Jr., Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP, Wilmington, DE; Robert McHale, McHale Law, Boston, MA for plaintiff.
for defendant: David A. Dorey and Craig N. Haring, Blank Rome LLP, Wilmington, DE; Jason A. Synderman, John Wixted, and Huaou Yan, Blank Rome LLP, Philadelphia, PA for defendants.
Case Number: D68471
Plaintiffs' complaint dismissed in favor of an agreement to arbitrate between the parties, where all of plaintiffs' claims arose from the parties' contract containing an enforceable arbitration clause, which was valid despite naming a non-existent arbitration forum and where defendants had not waived their right to arbitrate before another court.
Publication Date: 2019-02-20
Practice Area: Civil Rights | Education Law
Industry: Education
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Laura Davis Jones, James I. Stang, and James E. O'Neill, Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP, Wilmington, DE; Alexander S. Zalkin and Ryan M. Cohen, The Zalkin Law Firm, P.C., San Diego, CA for plaintiff.
for defendant: James D. Taylor, Jr., Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendants.
Case Number: D68464
Plaintiff's Title IX and equal protection claims were time-barred where her timely allegations merely amounted to continuing ill effects from the original alleged violations and were not continual unlawful affirmative acts by defendants that would support finding plaintiff's claim timely under a continuing violation theory.
Publication Date: 2019-02-20
Practice Area: Securities Litigation
Industry: Financial Services and Banking | Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Patrick F. Morris, Karen L. Morris and R. Michael Lindsey, Morris and Morris LLC, Wilmington, DE; Ste-ven E. Fineman, Daniel P. Chiplock, Michael J. Miarmi, Richard M. Heimann, Bruce W. Leppla and Sha-ron M. Lee, Liefe Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, New York, NY for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Kelly E. Farnan, Richards Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Peter A. Wald, Abid R. Qureshi, Christopher S. Turner and Christopher R. Harris, Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, DC for Navient Corp. and individual defendants. Kevin G. Abrams and John M. Seaman, Abrams & Bayliss LLP, Wil-mington, DE; Adam S. Hakki, Daniel C. Lewis and Anthony D. Marinello of Shearman & Sterling LLP for underwriter defendants.
Case Number: D68465
Plaintiffs adequately stated claims for securities violations, except with regard to statements that were mere puffery and where plaintiffs failed to demonstrate scienter.
Publication Date: 2019-02-13
Practice Area: Personal Injury
Industry: Federal Government
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys: For plaintiff: David C. Weiss and Jennifer Lynne Hall, U.S. Attorney's Office, Wilmington, DE for defendants.
for defendant: N/A
Case Number: D68461
The court dismissed plaintiff's complaint under the Federal Tort Claims Act because he failed to show that he exhausted his administrative remedies prior to filing in court.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Jonathan H. Lomurro, Gary L. Riveles, Abbott S. Brown
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2019-01-23
Practice Area: Administrative Law | Evidence
Industry: Health Care
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Gary C. Linarducci, New Castle, DE; Thomas D. Sutton, Leventhal, Sutton & Gornstein, Trevose, PA for plaintiff.
for defendant: Nora Koch and Heather Benderson, Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel, Philadelphia, PA for defendant.
Case Number: D68436
An administrative law judge improperly substituted her opinion for that of plaintiff's treating specialist, and her opinion re-garding plaintiff's medical condition was not based on substantial evidence.
Publication Date: 2019-01-16
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Agriculture | Chemicals and Materials | Consumer Products
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Chad S.C. Stover and Regina S.E. Murphy, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Wilmington, DE; Robert D. Mac-Gill, Lynn C. Tyler, Deborah Pollack-Milgate, Joseph T. Wendt and Jessica M. Lindemann, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Indianapolis, IN for plaintiff.
for defendant: Frederick L. Cottrell, III, Jeffrey L. Moyer and Nicole K. Pedi of Richards, Layton & Finger, Wilmington, DE; Gerald F. Ivey, John M. Williamson, Anand K. Sharma, Rajeev Gupta, Aidan C. Skoyles, Karthik Kumar and Daniel F. Roland, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC for defendant.
Case Number: D68424
In this patent claim construction matter, the court provided clarification to give meaning to all the claim terms.
Publication Date: 2019-01-02
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Accounting | Consulting | Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Brian C. Ralston and Jacob R. Kirkham of Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: David A. Dorey and Adam V. Orlacchio of Blank Rome LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: D68410
Plaintiff failed to state a claim for breach of the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing where the contract specifically addressed the matter at issue, and defendant did not act unreasonably in requiring plaintiff to give notice prior to entering defendant's facility.
Publication Date: 2019-01-02
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: E-Commerce | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys: For plaintiff: David E. Moore, Bindu A. Palapura and Stephanie E. O'Byrne of Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Jonathan K. Waldrop, Darcy L. Jones, Marcus A. Barber, John W. Downing, Heather S. Kim and Jack Shaw of Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP , Redwood Shores, CA; Hershy Stern and Rodney R. Miller of Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP, New York, NY for plaintiff.
for defendant: Steven J. Balick and Andrew C. Mayo of Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, DE; Thomas L. Duston and Tron Y. Fun of Marshall, Gerstein and Borun, LLP, Chicago, IL for defendants.
Case Number: D68409
Plaintiff's patent claims involved abstract ideas, but the court denied defendant's motion to dismiss because unresolved factual issues existed regarding the nature of the claims.
Publication Date: 2018-12-19
Practice Area: Bankruptcy | Copyrights
Industry: Advertising | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D68396
The bankruptcy court properly dismissed counterclaims based on claim preclusion, judicial estoppel and col-lateral estoppel, and its fee award was objectively reasonable.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read