Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Shook Hardy'

You can use to get even better search results
January 17, 2003 |

Weighing the Fate of Roe v. Wade

9 minute read
People v. Riccardi
Publication Date: 2012-07-16
Practice Area: criminal law: state
Industry:
Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Bill Lockyer and Kamala D. Harris, Attorneys General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Assistant Attorney General, Sharlene A. Honnaka, Michael W. Whitaker and Stephanie C. Brenan, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
For defendant: Carla J. Johnson, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and Appellant.
Case number: No. S056842

Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 7966 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JOHN ALEXANDER RICCARDI, Defendant and A

In re Miranda
Publication Date: 2008-05-05
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: S058528

Cite as 08 C.D.O.S. 5360In re ADAM MIRANDA on Habeas Corpus.Nos. S058528 & S060781In the Supreme Court of CaliforniaLos Angeles County Superior Ct.Nos.

November 06, 2002 |

COPY: Firm-by-Firm Survey Responses

From Allen & Overy to Winston & Strawn, the Summer Associates Survey was summers' chance to dish on their firms. And dish they did. Get the skinny on everything from quality of work assigned to approachability of associates and partners to the relative fun of karaoke nights vs. fishing, wine tasting outings, baseball games ... . (You didn't think it was all business, did you?)
123 minute read
November 15, 2002 |

Firm-by-Firm Survey Responses

From Allen & Overy to Winston & Strawn, the Summer Associates Survey was summers' chance to dish on their firms. And dish they did. Get the skinny on everything from quality of work assigned to approachability of associates and partners to the relative fun of karaoke nights vs. fishing, wine tasting outings, baseball games ... . (You didn't think it was all business, did you?)
142 minute read
People v. Letner
Publication Date: 2010-07-29
Practice Area: Criminal Practice
Industry:
Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Fern M. Laethem, Lynn S. Coffin and Michael J. Hersek, State Public Defenders, under appointment by the Supreme Court, Alison Pease and Ronald F. Turner, Deputy State Public Defenders, for Defendant and Appellant Christopher Alan Tobin. Attorneys for Respondent: Daniel E. Lungren, Bill Lockyer and Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorneys General, George Williamson and Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorneys General, Mary Jo Graves, Assistant Attorney General, Ward A. Campbell, Matthew L. Cate, Eric L. Christoffersen, John G. McLean and Mark A. Johnson, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
For defendant: Attorneys for Appellant: J. Thomas Bowden and R. Clayton Seaman, Jr., under appointments by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and Appellant Richard Lacy Letner.
Case number: No. S015384

Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 9537pTHE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. RICHARD LACY LETNER and CHRISTOPHER ALLAN TOBIN,

December 20, 2001 |

Behind the Scenes: Lobbying Battles of 2001

Lobbying, a unique hybrid of government, law and business, compels us to measure success differently. Great lobbying campaigns can have any of a number of outcomes, many often shaded in gray. What matters is how the game is played. Here is a particular angle on 10 of the most important issues before Congress in 2001, a rundown of the players and a nifty illustration of the old maxim "politics makes strange bedfellows."
14 minute read
November 19, 2007 |

National Rankings

18 minute read
November 19, 2007 |

The Firm Reports

67 minute read
September 21, 2012 |

Attorney Ineligibility Order Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2(a)

Notice to the bar.
380 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources