Search Results

0 results for 'Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe'

You can use to get even better search results
September 13, 1999 |

L.A. Firms' Dirty Little Secret: Hourly Rates

The big firms are getting used to announcing gross revenues that have become, well, gross. They're begrudgingly willing to talk about partner draws that are moving to the million-dollar neighborhood. What the big law firms are still downright shy about are the building blocks of all that filthy lucre: billing rates. Los Angeles insiders don't want to go on the record about charging $500 for partners. Why? "When you start raising rates, you change the way lawyers view each other," says one recruiter.
5 minute read
In re Coudert Brothers LLP, 10 Civ. 9334 (VM)
Publication Date: 2011-03-25
Practice Area: Bankruptcy
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
Judge: District Judge Victor Marrero
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 10 Civ. 9334 (VM)

Cite as: In re Coudert Brothers LLP, 10 Civ. 9334, NYLJ 1202487802300, at *1 (SDNY, Decided March 21, 2011)District Judge Victor MarreroD

January 12, 2007 |

For White & Case, Global Expansion Was the Easy Part

Boasting almost 40 offices worldwide, White & Case has a global network that many firms are trying to emulate through their own international expansion. But the 2,000-lawyer firm has found that expanding across the globe is the easy part. Now, it's wrestling with how to best integrate and utilize the vast network it has acquired over the past three decades. How the firm will be managed going forward will be a major topic this weekend as White & Case partners meet in Prague for their annual retreat.
10 minute read
East Texas Judges Test Joinder Limits in Patent Reform's Wake
Publication Date: 2012-08-19
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

Both Congress and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit have clamped down on multi-defendant patent suits, but the changes haven't had much practical effect for defendants already ensnared in East Texas patent litigation.

Morales v. City of New York, 26575/05
Publication Date: 2007-12-31
Practice Area: Products Liability
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court, Kings County
Judge: Jack Battaglia
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 26575/05

Justice Jack M. Battaglia KINGS COUNTY Family Court Plaintiff was represented by Nicholas Wise, Esq. of Weitz & Luxemberg, P.C. Defendants the City of New

In re Coudert Brothers LLP, 10 Civ. 9334 (VM)
Publication Date: 2011-03-25
Practice Area: Bankruptcy
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
Judge: District Judge Victor Marrero
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 10 Civ. 9334 (VM)

Cite as: In re Coudert Brothers LLP, 10 Civ. 9334, NYLJ 1202487802300, at *1 (SDNY, Decided March 21, 2011)District Judge Victor MarreroD

Kendall-Jackson Winery, Ltd. v. Superior Court
Publication Date: 1999-12-03
Practice Area: trademarks
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeal of the State of California
Judge: THAXTER, HARRIS, and BUCKLEY
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Daniel E. Alberti et al., for Petitioner
For defendant: Maxwell M. Blecher et al., for Real Party in Interest
Case number: No. F033305

The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. The doctrine of unclean hands does not deny relief to a plaintiff guilty of any past misconduct; only misco

Patent Heavyweights in War Over Translation Technology
Publication Date: 2013-06-16
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

A looming trial in the case will showcase two of the country's most fearsome patent litigators — Douglas Lumish of Latham & Watkins for TransPerfect and Charles Verhoeven of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan for MotionPoint.

July 13, 1999 |

Genital Mutilation Is Basis for Asylum

Immigration officials erred in denying a Ghanian woman's application for asylum on the grounds that her fear of forced genital mutilation was not objectively reasonable, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled. The panel overturned the decision, thereby blocking the imminent deportation of Adelaide Abankwah, 29, who has been held at a detention facility in Queens, N.Y. for two and half years. Her case has drawn international attention and the support of human rights groups.
4 minute read
David Sanford and Katherine Kimpel of Sanford, Wittels & Heisler
Publication Date: 2010-05-20
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

Back in 2004, when they filed a gender discrimination suit against Novartis on behalf of three female sales reps, the Sanford Wittels partners had no idea they'd make history with a record-setting $250 million punitive damages verdict. They offer penetrating insights about Novartis's handling of the case--and the ruling's impact on future employment discrimination suits.

Resources

  • Unlocking the Power of Early Case Assessment Workflows

    Brought to you by Integreon

    Download Now

  • Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms

    Brought to you by Gallagher

    Download Now

  • State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

NEXT