Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Fish & Richardson'

You can use to get even better search results
April 06, 2023 | Law.com

Federal Judge Rejects Request to Treble Damages, Attorney Fees in Medical Device Infringement Case Against DePuy

A federal judge in Massachusetts has denied a plaintiff's request for an increase of nearly $50 million in damages and fees, after concluding that medical device business DePuy Synthes Products hadn't engaged in "egregious infringement behavior" that warranted "a punitive or vindictive sanction."
4 minute read
Iacovacci v. Brevet Holdings LLC
Publication Date: 2023-03-30
Practice Area: Discovery
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court, New York
Judge: Justice Alexander M. Tisch
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 158735/2016

Plaintiff Establishes That Defendants' Withholding of Requested Documents Is Willful

Exeltis USA Inc. v. Lupin Ltd.
Publication Date: 2023-03-21
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Martina T. Hufnal, Douglas E. McCann, Gregory R. Booker, Fish & Richardson P.C., Wilmington, DE; Brian Coggio, Fish & Richardson P.C., New York, NY; Megan A. Chacon, Bernard Cryan, Fish & Richardson P.C., San Diego, CA for plaintiffs.
For defendant: John C. Phillips, Jr., David A. Bilson, Phillips Mclaughlin & Hall, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Michael Nutter, McGuireWoods LLP, Chicago, IL; Merritt Westcott, McGuireWoods LLP, Houston, TX; Corinne S. Hockman, McGuireWoods LLP, Raleigh, NC for defendants.
Case number: 22-434-RGA

Patentees created their own definition for the term "about," but defined it in such a way as to make the term indefinite since it effectively created an unbounded value range for the claim.

March 11, 2023 | The Legal Intelligencer

New Partners 2023

The Legal Intelligencer congratulates the new class of partners for 2023.
47 minute read
Appellate Division, First Department: March 9, 2023
Publication Date: 2023-03-09
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Appeals & Motions List
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appeals & Motions List released on:March 7, 2023

Law Journal Press | Digital Book New York Attorney Discipline: Practice and Procedure 2024 Authors: Hal R. Lieberman, J. Richard Supple, Jr., Harvey Prager View this Book

View more book results for the query "Fish & Richardson"

March 07, 2023 | The Recorder

Quinn Emanuel Defends Cribl in Patent Dispute With Splunk

This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar. Read the complaint here.
1 minute read
InQuisient Inc. v. ServiceNow, Inc.
Publication Date: 2023-03-07
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: E-Commerce | Software
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Burke
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Susan E. Morrison, Fish & Richardson P.C., Wilmington, DE; Frank E. Scherkenbach, Adam Kessel, Andrew Pearson, Fish & Richardson P.C., Boston, MA; Jason W. Wolff, Fish & Richardson P.C., San Diego, CA; Excylyn Hardin-Smith, Fish & Richardson P.C., New York, NY for plaintiff.
For defendant: Jack B. Blumenfeld, Jennifer Ying, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Kevin P.B. Johnson, Diane M. Doolittle, Ray Zado, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Redwood Shores, CA; Marissa R. Ducca, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Jodie Cheng, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, San Francisco, CA for defendant.
Case number: 22-900-CJB

Court declined to dismiss patent infringement case at pleadings stage due to lack of patent-eligible subject matter where patent claims appeared to describe new method of electronic data management solving existing problems of flexibility and portability between databases, which constituted an inventive concept beyond the abstract idea of managing data.

Persawvere v. Milwaukee Elec. Tool Corp.
Publication Date: 2023-03-07
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Consumer Products | Manufacturing
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Williams
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Kelly Allenspach Del Dotto, Susan E. Morrison, Fish & Richardson P.C., Wilmington, DE; Kurt L. Glitzenstein, Jacob B. Pecht, Fish & Richardson P.C., Boston, MA for plaintiff.
For defendant: Amy M. Dudash, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Wilmington, DE; Jason C. White, Scott D. Sherwin, Maria E. Doukas, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Chicago, IL for defendant.
Case number: 21-400-GBW

Court declined to adopt limited construction of patent terms based on prosecution history where inventor had merely clarified patent to distinguish invention from prior art.

March 03, 2023 | The American Lawyer

Fish & Richardson Breaks Half-Billion in Revenue After 'Tremendous' Year in IP Litigation

The intellectual property-focused firm boosted gross revenue and equity partner profits by roughly 10% in 2022.
4 minute read
February 22, 2023 | The American Lawyer

83 Firms to SEC: Don't Tread on Me

The firms all signed onto an amicus brief opposing the regulator's effort to compel Covington & Burling to disclose confidential client information.
8 minute read

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources