0 results for 'Epstein Becker Green'
Fired Gordon Altman Partners Win Round
Two partners forced out of New York's Gordon Altman Butowsky Weitzen Shalov & Wein last month won a small victory last week in Manhattan Supreme Court, allowing them to stay in their offices two months longer than the firm wanted.District Judge Louis L. Stanton U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK For Plaintiff: Timothy J. McInnis, Esq., New York, NY and
Decided and Entered: December 21, 2006 500301 __________________________________ In the Matter of the Estate of ROSE BB., Deceased. RICHARD BB., Re
Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Sweeny, Freedman, JJ. 579 Index 602769/07 Simon Lorne, et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v 50 Madison Avenue LLC, et al., Defendants-Respo
Tracking Enhanced Earnings Awards
While the Legislature has not yet heeded calls to abolish enhanced earnings as a marital asset subject to equitable distribution, it appears that the respective Appellate Divisions are now making significant efforts to limit such enhanced earning capacity awards, particularly where there are limited actual contributions to the attainment of the EEC by the non-titled spouse.Decided and Entered: March 13, 2003 92646 ________________________________ In the Matter of a Trust Created by ROSE BB., Deceased. JAMES D. BENSON, as Co-Trustee of a
Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Harold Baer, Jr., District Judge), granting the Village of Port Chester's ("the Village") motion fo
Court Curbs Class Action In Gender Bias Case
In an employment discrimination decision significant to employers seeking to avoid class actions in court, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has ruled that an arbitration clause in an employment contract precluded one of the three plaintiffs in a gender discrimination class action from proceeding in federal court and required her to arbitrate her claim privately.Employment Law: Court Decisions Focus On Harassment, Retaliation
In two 5-4 decisions under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the U.S. Supreme Court has defined new standards for who qualifies as a "supervisor" in employment workplace harassment cases, thereby changing the standard now applied in the Second Circuit.The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion.VERNIERO, J. This appeal requires us to consider whether the jury's verdict in favor of plaintiff is sustainabl
Trending Stories
Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms
Brought to you by Gallagher
Download Now
State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
2024 ESI Risk Management & Litigation Readiness Report
Brought to you by Pagefreezer
Download Now