Acting Brooklyn Supreme Court Justice Danny Chun recently issued a 74-page ruling finding that two new DNA testing technologies meet New York’s admissibility standard and can therefore be heard by a jury—the first opinion of its kind in New York state court. 

The opinion follows two decisions by the New York Court of Appeals in 2020—People v. Williams and People v. Foster-Bey—that the two cutting-edge methods must first be subject to a hearing to determine if they met the Frye test. 

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]